Los Angeles Office Location
Hennig Ruiz & Singh
Not sure if you have a legal case? Call us to talk to a lawyer:
Free Consultations
213-985-1305
One Of The Most Successful Workers' Rights Trial Law Firms In California

California de minimus doctrine and your "off-the-clock" wages

A recent verdict in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation ignited a shift in off-the-clock wages.

Douglas Troester, a manager at a Starbucks coffee store in California, claimed that the corporation failed to compensate him for the time he spent completing miniscule tasks related to his position. Each shift, over 17 months of employment, he claimed Starbucks required him to clock out and still complete various necessary business requirements.

In his evidence, he alleged that the "close store procedure" included transmitting daily sales to larger corporate locations, activating the alarm and locking the front door. He also alleged that Starbucks policy included taking responsibility for his Starbucks associates, and he upheld his role as manager by walking individual employees safely to their vehicles.

California wages: The de minimus rule

After appeals and hearings, the Supreme Court considered the "de minimus rule" under federal law in Troester's case. The de minimus rule states that employers may disregard a payment to employees for "infrequent and insignificant" periods of time spent beyond scheduled hours. Troester claimed that he only spent approximately 10 minutes per shift completing closing activities, yet these minutes added up quickly.

Starbucks Corporation alleged that his small amount of unpaid time was minimal under the de minimus rule, as his minutes spent off the clock did not require compensation.

After appeals, the Ninth circuit asked the Supreme Court to determine whether the de minimus doctrine held true under specific sections of California Labor Law.

The verdict came with a corporate impact

The Supreme Court ruled that under California law, businesses must pay workers for tasks that prove significant and regular. Because Troester claimed that the corporation refused to compensate him for 10 minutes per shift for nearly a year and a half, the Ninth Circuit must now apply the Supreme Court's decision to Troester's case.

The significance of the verdict lies heavily in corporate environments. Thousands of employees, across the United States, work minutes off the lock to open businesses and close shops. Especially for companies as large as Starbucks Corporation, California's Ninth Circuit decision on de minimus rule wages impacts individual employees throughout the country.

Perhaps this ruling indicates a shift in off-the-clock employees' earnings, and California court may see an upswing in lawsuits centralized on missing earnings.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Super lawyers
  • California Employment Lawyers Association
  • Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles

What Our Clients Say About Us

  1. I needed great attorneys in a short period of time, it was an emergency situation. Some research led me to the Hennig, Ruiz & Singh. We spoke on the phone and they had me come into the office and started on my case immediately. They got me exactly what I wanted and did it in the shortest amount of time possible. They were caring, fair and extremely good at what they do. I definitely would recommend them to anyone. -Scott Rooney

  2. If you are looking for legal representation I would suggest for you to consider Hennig, Ruiz & Singh. Put succinctly, their legal team was intelligent, hard working, responsive, and very knowledgeable throughout our time working together. While I of course cannot divulge details about the assistance that the firm provided for me, I can and will say that their representation was pivotal and changed my life for the better beyond words... -Shane Guglielmo

  3. I went to this firm to have a separation letter reviewed and met a young lawyer named Janet Hong. She was extremely friendly, professional, thorough and quick. She reviewed the documentation promptly and gave me actionable advice. I was able to resolve everything quickly. I would not hesitate to recommend Janet to anyone seeking legal services. -Brendan Hagerty

Schedule a Free Consultation

Ready To Start Protecting Your Rights? Call 213-985-1305

Not Sure Whether You Need Lawyer?

Answer a few questions to see whether you have a case.
Get Started Here

Office Location

Hennig Ruiz & Singh
3600 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 1908
Los Angeles, CA 90010

Toll Free: 800-260-6542
Fax: (213) 310-8302
Map & Directions

Free Consultations

Contact Us